
BY MOHAMMAD TARIQUE SALEEM
In today’s hyper-connected world, where a single moment can be captured, shared, and dissected across the globe in seconds, political leaders are under unprecedented scrutiny. A recent YouTube video titled “Modi’s Awkward Laughter on World Forums: Became PM By Hook & Crook, Failed in Diplomacy” (https://youtu.be/Dt5nj1p07Sw?si=gdcU8fyh3m5rhabe) examines Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s chuckles during high-profile international forums.

What might have been intended as a lighthearted gesture has sparked widespread discussion, memes, and critique, highlighting the complexities of political optics in the digital age. The video’s provocative title suggests that Modi’s rise to power involved controversial strategies. While it stops short of providing concrete evidence, it echoes sentiments among critics who point to the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) sophisticated media machinery and strategic image control as key to Modi’s enduring political dominance.
Since assuming office in 2014, Modi has leveraged a carefully curated persona, charismatic, decisive, and relatable. Yet, this same persona invites polarized reactions, with supporters lauding his leadership and detractors questioning the methods behind his ascent. The phrase “by hook & crook” taps into this divide, implying a calculated approach that some view as undermining democratic norms.
Equally critical is the video’s claim of Modi’s “failure in diplomacy.” It does not delve into specific incidents but reflects a broader narrative that India’s international relations under Modi have been inconsistent. Critics often cite strained ties with neighbors like Pakistan and China, where border tensions and diplomatic standoffs have persisted.
Modi’s preference for bold public gestures, such as high-profile international visits or symbolic initiatives, sometimes overshadows traditional, behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts. While his global outreach has elevated India’s visibility, the video suggests that these efforts have not always translated into tangible diplomatic wins, leaving room for skepticism about his approach.
At the heart of the video is Modi’s laughter itself, a seemingly innocuous act that has fueled satire. Laughter can humanize leaders, making them appear approachable and relatable. However, in Modi’s case, these moments have been weaponized by critics, transforming spontaneous reactions into fodder for memes and editorial takedowns.
This phenomenon underscores the double-edged sword of leadership in the digital era, where unscripted moments are amplified and reinterpreted. A chuckle meant to diffuse tension can be spun into a narrative of awkwardness or insensitivity, particularly when viewed through the lens of political opposition.
Modi remains a towering figure in Indian politics, with approval ratings that many world leaders envy. His supporters admire his ability to connect with the masses, his focus on economic reforms, and his assertive global presence. Yet, his critics argue that his leadership style leans toward authoritarianism, with divisive rhetoric that alienates minorities and opponents. The video amplifies this polarization, using Modi’s laughter as a microcosm of the broader debate about his legacy. Ultimately, this critique reveals the challenges of modern leadership.
Every gesture, no matter how small, contributes to a leader’s image, both at home and abroad. For Modi, navigating this tightrope, balancing authenticity with diplomatic finesse, remains a defining test. As the world watches, his laughter serves as a reminder that in the age of viral moments, even a chuckle carries weight.